Minimum wages are going up by double digits in cities around the country and many workers are receiving social insurance payments for the first time.Friedman supports this thesis with several stories of successful, albeit oftentimes violent, struggles by workers in various parts of China for higher wages, more rights etc.
Labor unrest has been growing for two decades, and the past two years a-lone have brought a qualitative advance in the character of worker struggles.
While this might sound like a success story for the proletariat, Friedman loses me on the almost comic attempt to paint this relentless march towards prosperity for the working class as just another Pyrrhic Victory:
Perhaps workers can win a wage hike in one factory, social insurance in another. But this sort of dispersed, ephemeral, and desubjectivized insurgency has failed to crystallize any durable forms of counter-hegemonic organization capable of coercing the state or capital at the class level.
...Capital, meanwhile, has relied on several tried-and-true methods to prop up profitability...
Within the factory, the biggest development of the past few years is one that will be drearily familiar to workers in the US, Europe, or Japan: the explosive growth of various kinds of precarious labor, including temps, student interns, and, most importantly, “dispatch workers.”
...But the big story in recent years has been the relocation of industrial capital from the coastal regions into central and western China.Where Friedman paints the movement by capitalists towards employing more people in the Chinese interior as a desperate attempt to prop up a failing system, I see prosperity spilling over from one region into the next, as increasing wages and productivity in one part of China makes it increasingly worthwhile to complement the increasing focus of coastal workers on high wage and high productivity activities by moving some less-skilled jobs into poorer provinces where they still provide better opportunities to workers than the alternative of subsistence agriculture.
While the labor movements in many countries often invoke the imagery of locusts moving on after a greedy feast when they speak about the global movement of capital, I think this completely misses the point that factory jobs spill over into other regions because of the high wages they have brought rather than the devastation.
I think the best way to think about the problem with the locus metaphor is through the paradox in the words of Yogi Berra:
"Noone goes there anymore. It is too crowded."
Moving on only makes sense for capitalists if the high wages in a place have made it relatively unsuitable for low-wage tasks required for some aspects of production. This is the result of too many capitalists trying to employ the inhabitants of a certain country or region and can therefore not coincide with capitalists having abandoned that same place to see it drop back into misery.